The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed Appeal RA(S.A) 66/2018 for default, noting the appellants' absence and lack of interest despite multiple adjournments to prosecute the case.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):66/2018
Somasundharan.Kk & Anr V/S A.O, Trichur Urban Co Operative Bank Ltd & Ors
28/04/2023
No representation for appellants. Ld. Counsel for respondents reported ready.
The matter is posted to 27.9.2022 under caption ‘for dismissal’, as appellants were absent on 24.8.2022. On 27.9.2022, at request of advocate for appellants, matter is adjourned to 15.11.2022, 2.1.2023 and then to this date under the same caption of dismissal in order to give an opportunity to them to proceed with the case. In spite of that, appellants evinced no interest in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, Appeal RA(SA) 66/2018 is dismissed for default.
Sd/Chair Person
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for default due to the appellant's failure to appear despite advances opportunities?
Can the appeal be dismissed for default if the appellant evinces no interest in prosecuting it despite adjournments?
Somasundharan.Kk & Anr
A.O, Trichur Urban Co Operative Bank Ltd & Ors
Chair Person
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
