Order noting the late filing of the vakalatnama by the respondent-counsel and directing its immediate submission along with the reply while continuing an interim notice order.
Direction to file vakalatnama with reply; continuation of interim order regarding notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 89/2023(WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 168/2023
Between
Dinesh Shankarao Deshmukh, Prop. M/s Gajanan Construction & Anr. V/s.
… Appellant/s
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent/s & Anr.
Mr K. B. Deshpande, Advocate for Appellant. -: Order dated: 14/03/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the first Respondent submits that the reply is being filed today but it is seen that the vakalatnama is not yet filed. The vakalatnama shall also be filed together with the reply.
Interim order regarding serving of notice before taking steps shall continue.
Post on 10.04.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-21
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Shankarao Deshmukh
M/s Gajanan Construction
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
