K Vetrivel v. City Union Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):59/2022
K.Vetrivel V/S A.O.,City Union Bank Ltd & Anr
12/01/2023
Appellant counsel present, files POS for R1 to R6.
R1 to R3 Notice served.
R4 to R6 Returned as “No such person”.
Ld. Counsel R. Krishnamoorthy files Vakalath for R2 in Registry on 23/12/2022. Ld. Counsel Srinivasan files Vakalath for R1 & R3.
Appellant makes endorsement in the Appeal Book that R4 to R6 are given up today.
Service completed.
Appellant counsel is instructed to serve copy of Documents to Respondent Counsels In terms of Rules 13 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994.
Call on 17/01/2023 for service of Documents.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Vetrivel
- respondent
A.O., City Union Bank Ltd
- respondent
Others
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court