The Tribunal recorded that interlocutory applications were ready for hearing and agreed to decide them along with the main appeals when the main appeals themselves are ripe for hearing. The hearing was adjourned to 31.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:59/2015
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd V/S Dr. M. Senthil Nathan &Ors
14/12/2023
Advocate for Appellant represented that two interlocutory Applications are filed; one IA 116/2023 in RA 59/2015 and another IA 117/2023 in RA 62/2015 and this Tribunal informed Advocate for Appellant as those Applications are only for amendment of prayer in the Appeal, they will be decided along with the Appeal because the relief would have bearing on the outcome of the Appeal, for which he readily agreed and reported ready for arguments in main Appeals RA 59/2015 and RA 62 /2015.
Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2 represented that he also filed Interlocutory Applications and come prepared with IAs and requested to take IAs. When main Appeals themselves are ripe for hearing, there is no point in hearing Interlocutory Applications, therefore, those Interlocutory Applications, if necessary, will be decided along with main Appeal.
Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2 requested time till end of January, 2024, to argue main Appeals.
At his request, post the case on 31.01.2024, for hearing of main Appeals.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
Dr. M. Senthil Nathan
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
