Mr Nandyala Satyanarayana v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
"thin" one-line order regarding adjournment; lists pending date; no substantive decision recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 58 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
07.08.2023 Nandyala Satyanarayana … Appellant
-VsBank of Baroda & Another … Respondents
Ms. Swarnali Dutta, representing Mr. GVS Sree Rama Kumar, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Respondents are served but not represented.
It is submitted by the Learned Counsel for Appellant that the arguing Counsel is from Visakhapatnam who is not present today.
List on 11th August, 2023 before the Camp Court at Visakhapatnam.
It is made clear that no adjournment on any ground, whatsoever, shall be granted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nandyala Satyanarayana
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court