The Bench listed the appeal, recorded the appellant's submission seeking impleadment of an alleged assignee instead of the respondent, and granted an interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 42 of 2021
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
23.08.2023
LGW Limited
… Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Reliance Home Finance Ltd.
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Joy Saha, ld. Senior Counsel. Mr. Anik Banerjee, ld.counsel. Mr. Pujan Chakraborty, ld. Counsel.
For Respondent : Mr. Nimes Mishra, ld.counsel. Mr. A. Basu Mallick, ld. Counsel. Mr. Pratik Mukherjee, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Vakalatnama filed by the appellant is taken on record.
It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the appellant that loan disbursed by respondent no. 1 and 2 has been assigned to some other agency who needs to be impleaded in place of respondent no.1 and 2. Let necessary steps be taken by the appellant by moving appropriate application with copy to the proposed assignee.
List on 20.11.2023. Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
In the order dated 14.06.2023 it is recorded that supplementary affidavit filed by the respondent. The word “respondent” is substituted by word “appellant”.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 23.08.2023 19 /pkb
LGW Limited
M/s. Reliance Home Finance Ltd.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
