Shaik Mujeeb v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal dismissed an appeal filed against a DRT order due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement within the granted timeframe.
The appellate tribunal dismissed an appeal filed against a DRT order due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement within the granted timeframe.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: KOLKATA CAMP COURT AT DRT, VISAKHAPATNAM
Appeal No. 41 of 2022
(Arising out of SA 378/2019 In DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
14.08.2023
Shaik Mujeeb & Anr ..........Appellant
-Vrs-
Central Bank of India & Anr. ........Respondent
Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned counsel for the Appellant Mr.Sudhir Kumar Senapati, Learned counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Compliance of the order dt. 20.03.2023 regarding pre deposit has not been made despite granting sufficient time. Consequent to request made by the appellant on 12.05.2023, 13.06.2023 but till date compliance was not made. Accordingly appeal is liable to be dismissed being not maintainable for want of pre deposit.
O R D E R
Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
File be consigned to Record Room
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
(ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J) Chairperson
Dated: 14th AUGUST, 2023
Shaik Mujeeb & Anr.
Central Bank of India & Anr.
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court