Indian Bank v. Sri Bheemavarapu Nagireddy
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 281 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 85 of 2017 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 20.03.2023 | The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank and anr … Appellant |
|---|---|
| -Vs- | |
| Sri Bheemavarapu Nagreddy and | |
| ors | |
| ….Respondents | |
| Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, | |
| Learned Counsel Ms. Sarmistha | |
| Pal, Learned Counsel for the | |
| Appellant | |
| Ms. Swarnali Dutta, Learned | |
| Counsel for the Respondent | |
| Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel | |
| for the Respondent No. 3. |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
On 2nd January, 2023 the matter was listed today. It appears that in the order sheet dated 6th March, 2023 the matter was adjourned to 17th May, 2023. It is a wrong order. None of the parties appeared on that date. Hence that order cannot be taken into consideration.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank and anr
- respondent
Sri Bheemavarapu Nagreddy and ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court