DART Mumbai allowed the withdrawal of an appeal by M/s. Anantam & Ors. after the appellant submitted that the matter was settled with the respondent bank and the entire Outstanding Term Settlement amount had been paid.
Prayer allowed; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 379/2022 (WoD) In Appeal on Dairy No. 468/2022
Between
M/s. Anantam & Ors. V/s
Indian Overseas B ank Mr Sunil Humbr e , Advocate for Appellant.
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 29/03/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. C o unsel appearing for the Appellan t submits that the matter has been settled with the bank and that the entire OTS amount has bee n paid. He, therefore, seeks to wit h draw the appeal and a pursis is fil e d to that effect.
The praye r is allowed and the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-10
1
M/s. Anantam & Ors.
Indian Overseas Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
