The debtor-appellants contested the appeal on the ground that an application for modification suggested by the High Court was still pending. Consequently, this appeal was adjourned to 14.12.2023 for the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 636/2023
Between
TarunMadanmohan Das
Sole proprietor M/s AnandaAahar Veg. &Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank &Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr Mayank Samuel along with Mr SohailMukadam, i/b Cirus Legal,Advocate for Appellants.
Ms ShrutikaJadhav, i/b M/s VNA Legal, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 Bank.
Mr AnshulAnjarlekar, i/b M/s Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.2.
-: Order dated:21/11/2023:-
An application for modification as suggested by the Hon’ble
High Court is still to come.
Adjourned to 14.12.2023 for hearing.
mks-14
Sd/-
Chairperson
1
Tarun Madanmohan Das
M/s Ananda Aahar Veg.
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
