A Registrar's order dismissing R2 and R3 from Misc. Appl. 13/2023 and noting no counter was proposed by R1. The appellant was called to file AOS of R4. The matter was adjourned to 18/08/2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Misc. Appl. 13/2023 in R.A(S.A):36/2021
D.Chandrika V/S Central Bank Of India
10/08/2023
Representing counsel Poornima for Appellant present.
Informs that AOS is filed in the Registry.
Registry to verify.
R2 and R3 given up.
R1 counsel informs that there is no counter proposed in this MA 13/2023 (Restoration)
Call on 18/08/2023 for AOS of R4.
Sd/Registrar
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of suit was maintainable under the scheme of DRT/AIR.
Whether proposed counter by R1 would be sufficient grounds to reject the application for restoration.
Whether Registry requirements for AOS were complied with in MA 13/2023.
D.Chandrika
Central Bank Of India
As recorded by the court registry
24 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
