An appeal before the DRTA, Mumbai, where the tribunal refused an adjournment sought by the respondent due to late receipt of rejoinder and scheduled the hearing.
Adjournment refused; hearing posted for 06/09/2023
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 1040/2015 (Stay) In Appeal No. 356/2015
Between
Sanjay Harbanslal Arora … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondent/s M.M. Avhad, Advocate for Appellant.
Gurjyot Singh, i/b M/s. Theba Associates, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 04/08/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent seeks adjournment on the ground that a copy of the rejoinder was received late.
The parties shall get ready for a hearing. No further adjournment shall be granted.
Post on 06.09.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-18
1
Sanjay Harbanslal Arora
Bank of Maharashtra & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
