State Bank of India v. Ms Shri Sai Steels
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 221/2023 Date: 13.03.2023
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Shri Sai Steels
Present: Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the order impugned has been passed without considering the fact that the M.A., which was filed against the order of the Tribunal, was barred by time apart from the other ground, which was taken by the appellant in the objection to the M.A. No. 175/2022, copy of which has been appended as annexure no. 6 of the paper book. It is further contended that without condoning the delay, the order impugned has been passed, which is not sustainable in the eye of law.
Issue notice to the respondents by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within a week. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 26.05.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice required to be issued to the respondent was issued in compliance with procedural requirements.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Shri Sai Steels
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court