Bank of India v. Smt a Padma
Case brief
What is this about?
List order granting respondents three weeks to file opposition and the appellant two weeks to file a rejoinder in an appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 32 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
12.06.2023
Bank of India
… Appellant Vs. Smt. A. Padma & Ors. ….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. Counsel. Ms. Anandita Das, ld. Counsel. For Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mukherjee, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2 prays for and granted three weeks’ time to file opposition with copy to the appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 11.08.2023 for hearing of appeal.
Interim order to continue pending appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of India
- respondent
Smt. A. Padma & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court