The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai permitted the appellants to withdraw Appeal RA 30/2023 (OA 531/2015) based on an affidavit filed by counsel. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 15th day of November, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
RA 30/2023
(OA 531/2015 on the file of DRT-1, Ernakulam)
Between
…Appellants
1
And
No.91, Maker Chamber III, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021.
2
…Respondents
Counsel for Appellants : M/s Uma Maheswari & Co. Counsel for 1st Respondent : M/s R. Sugumaran & Co.
R2 to R8 are given up.
ORDER
Ld. Counsel for appellants sought permission to withdraw this Appeal and filed an affidavit to that effect.
For the reasons stated in the Affidavit, permission is accorded to withdraw the Appeal.
Accordingly, Appeal RA 30/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/[Justice S. Ravi Kumar] CHAIRPERSON
3
M/s Hotel Seagate
M/s Malabar Plantations
Mr. K.T. Joseph
J.M. Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
28 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
