Smt K Annapurna v. Union Bank of India and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 294 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
08.08.2023 Smt. K. Annapurna … Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India & Another ... Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Ms. Jayanti Ghoshal with Ms. Antara Biswas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Ms. Jayanti Ghoshal, Learned Counsel appears for Respondent No. 1. Vakalatnama of Respondent No. 1 is not on record. Let Vakalatnama be filed within a week.
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that they have not been served with the paper book. Appellant undertakes to serve paper book upon Respondent No. 1 within a week.
Respondent No. 1 may file opposition with copy to the Appellant within two weeks after receipt of the paper book. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Annapurna
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court