T R Vadhiraja v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive hearing held. The tribunal converted interlocutory applications into a date for arguments on the main appeal (RA(S.A):29/2022) due to the appeal's age, after counters were filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 891/2015 In
R.A(S.A):29/2022
T.R.Vadhiraja V/S A.O., Vijaya Bank
27/03/2023
Counter of first respondent bank is filed in IA 891/2015 (stay) today. Counters in IA 601/2015 (to restore possession) and IA 602/2015 (Injunction) are also filed today.
However, as appeal is of the year 2022, instead of taking above interlocutory applications, it is felt that main appeal itself can be taken up for hearing, for which, advocate for appellant has no objection and advocate for respondent bank sought time.
At request of Ld. Counsel for respondent bank, posted to 3.4.2023 for arguments in main Appeal i.e., RA (SA) 29/2022.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.R. Vadhiraja
- respondent
A.O., Vijaya Bank
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
26 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court