The Regular Appeal was adjourned on adjournment as the Bank's arguing counsel was indisposed. Hearing listed for 23.02.2024.
Case adjourned for 23.02.2024; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 282/2018 Date: 21.11.2023
Pawan Kumar Agarwal Vs. State Bank of India
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri Abhishek Kapariya, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the arguing counsel Shri P. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
As prayed, list this case on 23.02.2024 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Pawan Kumar Agarwal
State Bank of India
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
