Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Ms Bells Controls Ltd. and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 405 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.08.2023 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited … Appellant -VsM/s. Bells Controls Limited & 4 Others … Respondents Mr. Sarathi Das Gupta, Mr. Pratik Ghose and Mr. Avishek Roy Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Nimish Mishra with Ms. Bani Ghosh, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 5 None for Respondents No. 1 to 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 5 submits that due to certain miscommunication with the Advocate-on-record, opposition could not be filed.
A week’s time is granted to file opposition with copy to Appellant who may file rejoinder within a week thereafter. List on 29th August, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 01st August, 2023
13/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
- respondent
M/s. Bells Controls Limited
- respondent
4 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court