The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to comply with the requirement of a pre-deposit.
barred as not maintainable for want of pre-deposit
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 25 of 2018 (Arising out of O.A. 254 of 1999 in DRT-I, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
14.07.2023 Arya Bhandar Private Limited & 2 Others … Appellants -VsState Bank of India & Another … Respondents
Mr. Pratik Ghose with Mr. Avidhek Roy Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of order dated 26th April, 2023 regarding pre-deposit is not made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Accordingly, the instant appeal, being Appeal No. 25 of 2018, is dismissed being not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 14th July, 2023 03/ac
Arya Bhandar Private Limited & 2 Others
State Bank of India & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
