Regular Appeal listing granted after appellant's counsel sought adjournment due to unavailability of borrowing counsel from Patna; hearing fixed for subsequent date.
Case listed for hearing on 10.05.2023; written submissions invited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 245/2018 Date: 21.02.2023
Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kamal Prasad Vs. Central Bank of India
Present: Shri Anirudh Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri A. K. Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Ajad Khan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent-Borrower,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Borrower submits that in this matter, the arguing counsel, who comes from Patna, could not appear before this Tribunal today due to some personal difficulty, hence he prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 10.05.2023 for hearing. In the meantime, the learned counsels for the parties may file their written submissions, if they so desire.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kamal Prasad
Central Bank of India
Borrower
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
