Ms Tauschen Traidlink Pavt Ltd. v. Indian Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f
£
. I
FARAD
debts recovery appellIate tribunal.
MUMBAI
. Mlsc Application No. ■ Of 20
In I I. No.
Appeal No.-; ■ Ofon
OrV tNo . t3gs 1'2003 (f5e.guJ<a?r APiPeaJJ
C^IS- Tauschen. "T^rode li'nR fpvF-- LRJ
Appellants
(Advocate f/1’ 'TTOJ
j
Versus
Lr>d x a n 6onk
Respondents
V •
(Advocate^/ru het I f R h i la?re ,
J
Date and Registrar14Office*’s Notes,order* ____ /.AppearancesClwlrperson . I1IU ’s Orders
______ J.
2SM0
CVome Fb'tr ^ppdianv
’Ao'?)! €5 pooJen b-
l^dv- Vcadon-ibcnri PoHI
.. . p\dj i .Po'zr -- P-emoved - oF ch fec+ s bo 1*2 / 1Q-/ '2.0 cxs
\Q sV C hance •
•Xi c«
. J-
*2 W2IW3 None Fazr boR>
'
Ad] I^-oTT rQennovoJ o£ d +0 I'Zio'aj'ZoQq <ar
ta^A- C bance .
I
P.T.O.
I
Contd Sheet
)
| . Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| i 5 |
1
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court