The Tribunal allowed an application for condonation of delay and impleadment, noting the death of a respondent and pandemic-related complications justified the late filing.
Application for condonation of delay allowed; application for impleadment allowed and posted for amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 590/2022 (CoD) And I.A. No. 63/2023 (Amendment) In
Appeal No. 220/2016
Between
Ramesh H. Mirchandani & Anr.
V/s.
The DCB Bank Ltd & Ors.
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
Mr Surya Das, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Rashmita Musalgi, i/b M/s. M.V.Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated: 27/01/2023:-
I.A. No. 590/2022 is an application for condonation of delay.
1
right by causing the delay the application for condonation of delay is allowed and the application for impleadment is taken on files and allowed.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-26
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application for condonation and impleadment is sufficient to be condoned.
Ramesh H. Mirchandani & Anr.
The DCB Bank Ltd & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
