This order lists the appeal for 22.03.2023. The appellant counsel submitted that objections must have been raised initially and the application is misconceived, requesting leave for the respondent Bank to file a reply on the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 208/2017 Date: 30.01.2023
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani and Anr. Vs. Allahabad Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the respondentAllahabad Bank,
Ex-parte against the respondents no. 2 to 6, Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Central Bank of India,
Learned counsel for the respondent-CBI has filed reply to leave application.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that if such objections were to be made, it should have been made at very initial stage and now such application is only misconceived and the same has not deliberately been filed. If the respondent-Bank chooses to file reply to the appeal, they may to do so by the next date.
List this case on 22.03.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani and Anr.
Allahabad Bank and Ors.
Shri R. D. Khare
Shri Anupam
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
