K P Murugesan v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order recording adjournment and listing of service issues in an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):7/2023
K.P.Murugesan V/S State Bank Of India
02/05/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Files Affidavit of substituted service in respect of R7.
Issue paper publication in English and Vernacular Newspapers for R7.
Appellant clarified that details of R4 was already noted in the case filed before DRT and hence may be continued.
Ld. Counsel Meera Gnanasekar files Vakalath for R3.
Appellant has served copy of Documents to R3 counsel.
Ld. Counsel M.L. Ganesh has filed Vakalath in respect of R1 and R2
None for R5 and R6.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.P. Murugesan
- respondent
State Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court