Mr S Chrispin Raj v. Repco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai, while hearing interlocutory applications, decided to take up the main appeal. The matter was posted for arguments on 1.3.2023 with a warning against further adjournment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):2/2021
S.Chrispin Raj V/S A.O.,Repco Bank
13/02/2023
Heard both sides in interlocutory applications, viz., 167/2021 (Direction) & IA 168/2021 (to furnish statement of accounts).
It is felt that instead of deciding interlocutory applications, it is better to take up main appeal and interlocutory applications filed for summoning records (documents) will be decided along with Appeal and when this is put to advocate for appellant, he sought time for arguing Appeal.
At request of Ld. Counsel for appellant, posted to 1.3.2023 for arguments in Appeal. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be given on that day.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- applicant
S.Chrispin Raj
- respondent
A.O.,Repco Bank
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
26 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court