The tribunal allowed the appellant's application for substituted service against several respondents and directed them to prove publication before the Registrar.
Application for substituted service allowed; provision of proof of publication directed before Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 185/2013
Between
Union Bank of I n dia … Appellant/s V/s. Mr Naresh N Jai n & Ors. …Respondent/s Ms Meenu P., i/ b Ms Rathina Maravarman, Advoca t e for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 28/04/2023:-
The Appel l ant has filed an application for s u bstituted service against Respond e nt Nos. 1,3,4, 5 & 6 and hence, t he application is allowed and pro d uced proof of publication before t h e Registrar. Post on 28. 0 6.2023 before Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-18
1
Union Bank of India
Naresh N Jain
Ms Rathina Maravarman
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
