The DRTA noted the respondent bank produced documents, but no advocate for the appellant appeared to inspect them. Documents were sent to safe custody and a hearing was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 184/2014
Between
Dr. Suman Shiva j i Rathod … Appellant/s V/s. Indian Overseas B ank …Respondent/s Ms Rashmita M , i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 29/03/2023:-
The Ld. C ounsel appearing for the Res p ondent Bank is producing the d ocuments before the Tribuna l as undertaken However, none a ppears for the Appellant to inspe c t the documents as agreed.
The docu m ent shall be kept in the safe custody of this Tribunal and the Appell a nts are at liberty to make an application for same. inspection of the Post on 23. 0 5.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-27
1
Dr. Suman Shiva ji Rathod
Indian Overseas Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
