Asha Jaiswal v. Punjab National Bank and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
None. The court granted an adjournment on the grounds that the counsel for the respondent-Bank was out of station.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 176/2017 Date: 26.05.2023
Asha Jaiswal Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri B. K. Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri Dhananjay Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is out of station, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment.
As prayed on behalf of the counsel for the respondent-bank, list this case on 18.08.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asha Jaiswal
- respondent
Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court