The DRAT Chennai appellate appeal was declined due to non-compliance of office objections and document uploads within the stipulated time under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules.
Appeal declined under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules due to non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:232/2023
State Bank Of India V/S Standard Chartered Bank
05/07/2023
Representing counsel K. Deepa present for Appellant.
Few office objections including uploading of Documents have not been complied till now despite Opportunities given.
Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, as office objections are not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
State Bank Of India
Standard Chartered Bank
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
