City Union Bank Limited v. Gnanathamilarasi
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/16/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a continuation of arguments hearing in a debt recovery appeal where the petitioner/appellant bank and respondent 1 are present, while the second respondent had no representation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
IA 185/2023 In RA (SA) 16/2023
¶3
A.O., City Union Bank Vs Ganathamilarasi And 2 Others
¶4
11/10/2023
¶5
No representation for R2. Ld. Counsel for R3 reported ready.
¶6
At request of Ld. Counsels for petitioner/appellant bank and R1, posted to 1.11.2023 for continuation of arguments. Written arguments of R1 by then.
¶7
Chair Person
¶8
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
A.O., City Union Bank
- respondent
Ganathamilarasi
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court