Emaar Mgf Land Limited v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal noted incomplete pleadings, scheduled fresh arguments, set a hearing date, and allowed the opportunity for remaining respondents to file opposition and Vakalatnamas.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 146 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
21.08.2023 Emaar MGF Land Limited … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 3 Others … Respondents Mr. Manoj Kumar Tiwary with Mr. Satwik Beriwala and Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/Bank
Mr. Ajit Keshari, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 2 and 3
Mr. Deva Nand Misra with Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
This is an old appeal of 2018. Record shows that a Vakalatnama, by one Mr. Shantanu Saha, Advocate, was filed on behalf of Respondents No. 2 and 3 but no opposition is filed by them.
Today Mr. Ajit Keshari, Advocate, appears and undertakes to file fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondents No. 2 and 3; who may file opposition subject to payment of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) as costs to be paid to the State Legal Services Authority.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Emaar MGF Land Limited
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court