Appeal R.A. 135/2017 was dismissed because the appellant bank failed to prosecute further and did not show interest despite sufficient time granted for taking steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:135/2017
Syndicate Bank V/S Sri Krishna Murthy & Anr
14/02/2023
Advocate for appellant represented that in spite of issuance of notice in the month of June, 2022, no response is received from appellant, therefore, he would leave the matter to the discretion of this Tribunal.
Though sufficient time is granted for taking steps, appellant bank does not show any interest in prosecuting further. Therefore, Appeal RA 135/2017 is dismissed for not taking steps.
Chairperson
Sd/-
Syndicate Bank
Sri Krishna Murthy & Anr
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
