Dr Anupama v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal under the SARFAESI Act was not disposed of as the Appellate Tribunal found that the filing was outside the period of limitation, and the matter is posted for removing defects.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Regular Appeal Dy. No. 666 of 2023, Date 27/09/2023
Dr. A. Anupama -----Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India & Ors. ------- Respondent
Received an appeal filed online on 24/09/2023 and hard copy on 27/09/2023 u/s 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate Mr. Nemani Srinivas on behalf of Dr. A. Anupama, Appellant.
The appeal has been filed on behalf of Dr. A. Anupama, against the order dated 16/08/2023 in S.A. No. 177 of 2022 in DRT-II, Hyderabad. Appeal fee with vakalatnama fee of Rs.13755/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 2409230006326 dated 24/09/2023 has been paid through online along with the appeal.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
On scrutiny it is found that the appeal is not within the period of limitation.
Post the matter on 03/10/2023 for appearance and removal of defect by the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. A. Anupama
- respondent
Union Bank of India & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court