Smt Srilakshmi Cherkuri v. Ms Varasiddi Vinayaka Cotton Mill
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 133 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 13.06.2023 | Smt. Srilashmi -Vs- M/s. Varasiddi Mill & Another |
Cherukuri … Appellant Vinayaka Cotton … Respondents |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pankaj Learned Couns |
Kumar Mukherjee, el for Appellant |
|
| Ms. Swarnali Counsel for Res |
Dutta, Learned pondent No. 1 |
|
| Ms. Aparajit Mr. Souvik |
a Ghosh with Ghosh, Learned |
|
| Counsel for 2/Bank |
Respondent No. |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
On the request of Respondent No. 1 let opposition to the appeal be filed within four weeks with copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed two weeks thereafter. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 submits that Bank will not file any opposition.
List on 11th August, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 13th June, 2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Srilashmi
- respondent
M/s. Varasiddi Mill
- respondent
Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court