Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Nirvan Birla and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal heard an interim application and posted the matter for a further hearing, suggesting the order is procedional.
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal heard an interim application and posted the matter for a further hearing, suggesting the order is procedional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 36/2022 (Stay) In Appeal No. 13/2022
Between
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Nirvan Birla & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Sachin Chandrana along with Mr Archit Shah & Ms Mahak Naik i/b M/s M. K. Ambalal & Co., Advocate for Appellant Bank. Ms Somya Tripathi, i/b M/s. T. N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 22/08/2023:-
Heard in part.
Post on 22.09.2023 for further hearing.
Interim order, if any, shall continue till the next date of hearing. Sd/Chairperson mks-25
1
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Nirvan Birla
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court