The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed Appeal No. 13 of 2020 filed by Pyarimohan Rout in default as the appellant failed to appear while the respondent bank's counsel was present. Pending applications were closed and interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 13 of 2020 (Arising out of O.A. 367 of 2014 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 02.02.2023 | Pyarimohan Rout | ray … Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| -vs- | ||
| Branch Manager, | Bank of Baroda | |
| & 3 Others … | Respondents |
None for Appellant
Mr. Dipanjan Dutta, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank is present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 13 of 2020, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 2nd February, 2023 16/ac
Pyarimohan Rout
Bank of Baroda
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
