M/S Arena Machineries Limited and Ors. v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 127 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.07.2023 M/s. Arena Machineries Limited & 3 Others … Appellants -vsUCO Bank … Respondent Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Soumo Mukherjee and Ms. Sweta Mishra, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Santosh Kumar Ray with Ms. Sonal Agarwal, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Pleadings are complete. It is submitted that Appeal No. 128 of 2022 is preferred by the Respondent Bank against the same impugned order. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice that both the appeals be decided by a common judgment.
Accordingly, list on 14th July, 2023 along with Appeal No. 128 of 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 05th July, 2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Arena Machineries Limited & 3 Others
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court