Appeal dismissed in default as Appellant, though served, did not appear to represent the matter, indicating unwillingness to proceed.
Appeal No. 124 of 2018 stands dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 124 of 2018
(Arising out of M.A. 14 of 2014 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
14.02.2023 M/s. G.R. Industries … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 9 Others … Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
Mr. Rajeev Maity with Ms. K. Deb, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 10.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-service filed is kept with the record.
In compliance of the order dated 29th August, 2022 Appellant was served. Despite service, none appears to represent the Appellant. In such circumstances, it appears that Appellant is not willing to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 124 of 2018, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 14th February, 2023 15/ac
M/s. G.R. Industries
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
