Maduri Sampath Kumar v. Union Bank of India (Andhra Bank)
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 123 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.10.2023 Maduri Sampath Kumar … Appellant
-VsUnion Bank of India & 3 Others … Respondents
Mr. Debasish Mitra, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Aparajita Rao with Ms. Ankana Basu, Counsel for Respondent No.1/Bank
Mr. Avishek Verma with Ms. Sneha Giri, Counsel for Respondents No. 2, 3 and 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2, 3 and 4 pray for and is granted time to file opposition to the stay application.
Learned Counsel for Appellant prays for stay of operation of the impugned order on the ground that if the documents of title are released, the appeal would become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Maduri Sampath Kumar
- respondent
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court