Rudra Bhattacharya v. Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. Dy No. 466 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
19.09.2023
Rudra Bhattacharya & Anr.
… Appellants Vs.
AO, Bank of India & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : In person
For Respondents : Mr. R. C. Prusti, ld. Advocate
Ms. Alisha Kar, ld. Advocate.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2 is present. Appellant is appearing in person. Respondent no. 3 and 4 are not present. Affidavit of service is also not filed. Appellant is directed to file affidavit of service in respect of respondent no.3 and 4 within a week.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rudra Bhattacharya & Anr.
- respondent
AO, Bank of India
- respondent
Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court