Tamil Nadiu Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. Anandaram Varadarajan
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 130/2023 in A.IR:451/2022
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd V/S Anandaram Varadarajan
07/06/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Affidavit of substituted service in respect of R3 and R4 still awaited from Appellant.
Undertaking counsel K. Maheshwaran again seeks further time for filing Vakalath of R1 and R2.
Appellant counsel instructed to serve copy of Documents to Counsel of R1 and R2 on filing Vakalath to enable filing counter.
Call on 22/06/2023 for Affidavit of substituted service in respect of R3 and R4 and also for Vakalath/counter of R1 and R2.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd
- respondent
Anandaram Varadarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court