Mr G Murugesan v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order calling parties to provide documents and a delay petition to enable the Respondent Bank to file a counter-affidavit in the debt recovery appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 131/2023 In A.IR:22/202 3
G.Murugesan V/S Punjab National Bank & Ors
04/05/2023
None for Appellant. AOS is not filed yet.
Ld. Counsel K.N. Chinnakrishnan has filed Vakalath in respect of R1 Bank.
Appellant counsel instructed to provide copy of Documents and IA 131/2023 (Delay) petition to the Respondent Bank in terms of Rules 13 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 on priority to enable Respondent to file counter in the matter.
Call on 19/05/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Murugesan
- respondent
Punjab National Bank & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court