Appellant failed to comply with objections regarding deficit court fee, resulting in the appeal being declined.
Appeal declined due to non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:26/2023
M/S Jai Hind Spinning Mills Ltd & Ors V/S The South Indian Bank Ltd & Ors
11/05/2023
Appellant Counsel Present.
A few objections including Deficit Court Fee is pending for Compliance despite Sufficient opportunities given.
Accordingly Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections are not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
M/S Jai Hind Spinning Mills Ltd & Ors
The South Indian Bank Ltd & Ors
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
