The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata dismissed Appeal No. 102 of 2019 in default as the appellant failed to appear. Pending interim orders were closed and vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 102 of 2019
(Arising out of S.A. 226 of 2019 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.03.2023 Satrughan Prasad & 2 Others … Appellants -VsPunjab National Bank & 4 Others … Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up. None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank is present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 102 of 2019, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 13th March, 2023 18/ac
Satrughan Prasad & 2 Others
Punjab National Bank & 4 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
