Simaran Steel Industries v. Icici Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 119/2019 In Regular Appeal No. 102/2014 Date: 21.02.2023
Simran Steel Industries and Anr. Vs. I C I C I Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Ankit Prakash, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Pandey, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that he has not been served with the copy of restoration application. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that although the copy of restoration application has already been served, but he undertakes to serve the same once again upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank within 48 hours, who may file reply by the next date.
List this case on 15.05.2023 for restoration.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Simran Steel Industries and Anr.
- respondent
I C I C I Bank and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court