Benches heard an appeal dismissed as infructuous after recording that parties had amicably settled the matter.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 10/2023 Date: 29.05.2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr. Naushad Ahmad & Ors.
Present: Shri Varun Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kundan Rai, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Shariq Shamim, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3, Shri Bhartendra Pratap Singh, counsel for the respondent no. 4,
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that the parties have entered into amicable settlement and nothing remains to be decided, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. In this regard, affidavit has been filed, which is taken on record.
In view of the submission as made above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Mr. Naushad Ahmad & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
