A Rangasamy v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal refused a request for further time for arguments in a thinly cited dismissal case. Consequently, the delay application and the main appeal were dismissed and rejected respectively for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
IA 372/2022 dismissed for non prosecution. AIR 190/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 7th day of September, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 372/2022 (Delay) In
AIR 190/2022 (OA 355/2014 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
- A. Rengasamy,
S/o Ayyavoo,
Sole Proprietor, M/s AGR Bricks, No.170/1A, Main Road, P.N. Palayam, Block 24, Veerapandi, Coimbatore 641 108.
Also at:
2/52, S.V. Colony, Veerpandi, Coimbatore 641 108.
Also at:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant further time for arguments despite the matter being posted for dismissal.
Whether to allow the delay application and the consequential appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Rengasamy
- appellant
R. Suguna
- respondent
Indian Bank
- respondent
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090001902022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
22 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court