Raju Baral v. Icici Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In this miscellaneous application, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal rejected a prayer for an order expediting the disposal of a settled major appeal. The Chairperson found no ground to direct expeditious disposal despite the appellant's claim and an interim order in his favor.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for direction to the DRT for expeditious disposal of S.A. 654 of 2022 was dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appl. Dy No. 388 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
19.06.2023
Raju Baral
Appellant
Vs.
ICICI Bank & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Saptarshi Guha, ld. Adv.
For Respondent : None
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
A D M I S S I O N
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned DRT should be directed to dispose of the main appeal expeditiously given the delay and the appellant's claim of being ousted from his house.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Raju Baral
- respondent
ICICI Bank & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court