Rajesh Kumar v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a note of hearing regarding an appeal filed in the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. It records service of notices, filing of documents, and a call for counter-arguments, but it contains no substantive adjudication by the court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 162/2023 In A.IR:29/202 3
Rajesh Kumar V/S State Bank Of India & Anr
29/05/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Files AOS in respect of R1 and R2.
R1 notice served.
R2- Returned as unclaimed (Deemed to have been served).
Ld. Counsel Bharathi for Raghavulu Naidu undertakes to file Vakalath for R1 Bank.
Appellant has served copy of Documents including delay petition to undertaking counsel to enable file counter.
Call on 12/06/2023 for counter.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajesh Kumar
- respondent
State Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090000292023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court